LEADERSHIP: ARE YOU DRIVEN BY VISION OR VENGEANCE?

Published: 2010-06-28   please add a comment below

You can inspire and energise people – for an exciting and successful journey
not relying on centralisation and control that may diminish commitment and achievement

Kevin Rudd resigned his Prime Ministership rather than face being voted out by his own party colleagues. What transformed a resounding electoral win in December 2007 into this current humiliation? More importantly, as leaders, how can you or I avoid such outcomes? And, what are the warning signs? Here are half a dozen.

For me, the underlying issue is often the mindset and emotions we bring to a leadership situation. Is it expansionary: open, positive and caring of the challenges and people. Or, contractionary: closed, centralised and disdainful? And, I assure you I’ve operated in each mode – and so in reflecting on Rudd’s experience, I can empathise as well as judge.

In general, or for each leadership issue you’re currently facing, mark where you’re operating on the six spectra below! Far left, far right, or in-between?

Expansionary focus Contractionary focus
Destination and goals < – – – – – – > Process and control
Delegation < – – – – – – > Centralisation
Reality and evidence < – – – – – – > Theory and assertion
Pragmatism and compromise < – – – – – – > My way or the highway
Caring and flexibility < – – – – – – > Endurance and intransigence
Planning and then implementing < – – – – – – > Deciding and assuming it’s done

If we consider a number of issues across Rudd’s Prime Ministership, the financial stimulus programs, hospital reform and the recent Resources Super-Profits Tax, he operated nearer to the right than the left emotionally. But, why?

How is it we adopt a particular mode? From my experience and observation, these choices are often subconscious – reflecting deep-seated events from childhood or later. Given Rudd’s challenging early years, it’s not surprising he might be angry and combative with people holding economic or other power, and have a deep desire to control his environment.

There are times when the right-hand side of the ledger is appropriate. But, only if that is going to meet your current (as opposed to past) needs. And, that’s what my Leadership Action Planning tool helps you do. Plan consciously your leadership actions to ensure they address the concerns of those you’re trying to lead today and the challenges you and they are actually facing – not phantoms from the past. What you need is a plan of leadership actions to inspire them to trust and join you on the journey. The alternative is normally not as dramatic or newsworthy as Rudd’s demise, but can be devastating nonetheless. So, why not avoid it?



Dr. Timothy Pascoe AM
PhD (Cambridge), MBA (Harvard), BE & BEc (Adelaide)
Creator, V|E|C|T|O|R Leadership®



Name
*will be displayed beside your comment
Email address
*won't be displayed
Comment
Conditions of posting: please feel free to post your views, but note that any post that is defamatory, contains bad language, or is spam will be blocked and deleted.
*
Email me when other comments are posted

Fields marked with * are required

This Potshot has no comments yet


Would you like to reproduce this Potshot?

We encourage people to republish this Potshot online, or in print. However, please take the time to read our License Terms and so that you can properly attribute the republished Potshot