Leadership: what a load of rubbish!

Published: 2011-09-25   There are 7 comments ... please add yours below

This Potshot was prompted by:

“The Wise Leader”
Harvard Business Review, May 2011

URL: http://hbr.org/2011/05/the-big-idea-the-wise-leader/ar/1

(Please note: pages linked here may require a subscription with the publisher to view the full page)

You can lead more effectively if you combine the logics of both analysis and values
keeping clear of an unbalanced approach that delivers only half the picture

According to a recent Harvard Business Review article, “In an era when discontinuity is the only constant, the ability to lead wisely has nearly vanished.” What nonsense. This sort of populist generalisation about leaders makes me mad. I’ve been around for decades and there’s little new in what’s happening today. And, if I’d lived for centuries, the same would be true. Cycles are part of evolution. So are good and bad decisions. And, the main problem today is not in business but politics and government. The failure to legislate and regulate well – and promptly. If you want to follow my rant further, please continue below.

In the businesses I know and in those I read about, I observe lots of sensible and tough strategic decisions being made by honest and sensible leaders. There’s no guarantee they’ll be right but that’s the real world. And, if we look at today’s problems in global finance (whether the mortgage-driven fall-out in America or government debt in Europe), the responsibility lies not so much with bankers as with politicians and their regulators. They failed to act on what was happening quite openly in the derivatives markets and now the sovereign debt markets. Japan’s “lost decade” of the 1990s followed a similar script.

Yes, bankers go wild – even feral at times. But, banks are only one segment of business. And, as with all businesses, competition drives them to innovate. They are like the makers of fast cars: rewarded for vehicles that are dangerously fast (and aesthetically enticing). It’s up to politicians and police to make sure what’s offered is safe and driven within the rules. The bureaucrats can’t go to sleep (or become captives of those they regulate) particularly as the world embraces ever newer and faster offerings.

The vast majority of business leaders I’ve known (and worked with, including bankers) have been honest, decent people: often money-motivated but also caring about their customers, employees and communities. We all cut corners (I certainly do at times) but I’ve only encountered two or three, who knowingly did something significant that was illegal or grossly antisocial. Interestingly, their failure seemed more the result of hubris (or self-deception) once successful than dishonesty while scrabbling to the top.

Now let me turn to the five actions Professors Nonaka and Takeuchi offer to wise leaders in their HBR article. It’s hard to disagree that a leader should:

  • Judge goodness … and practice moral discernment.
  • Grasp the essence … sense what lies behind … fathom the meaning of people, things and events.
  • Create shared contexts … encourage executives and employees to learn from one another.
  • Communicate the essence … use stories, metaphors and other figurative language.
  • Exercise political power … get people to synthesise their knowledge and efforts.

Worth noting but all a bit old-hat and sanctimonious (in the article), which I believe wise leaders should avoid. I prefer fresh thinking with its chance of insight … if also the risk of error.

Would you like to reproduce this Potshot? See License Terms



Dr. Timothy Pascoe AM
PhD (Cambridge), MBA (Harvard), BE & BEc (Adelaide)
Creator, V|E|C|T|O|R Leadership®



Name
*will be displayed beside your comment
Email address
*won't be displayed
Comment
Conditions of posting: please feel free to post your views, but note that any post that is defamatory, contains bad language, or is spam will be blocked and deleted.
*
Email me when other comments are posted

Fields marked with * are required

Comments (7)

Timothy Pascoe - date: 2011/09/28 07:57 am


Dear Roger,
Thanks for your note and query below. Re the financial instruments, I don't hold myself out as an expert. But, for me, innovation in any and all fields is beneficial - even if in each wave there is froth and foam (as well as blue water) that needs to be skimmed off and discarded.
As in the Potshot, to continue the metaphor, I think the politicians and regulators have been asleep on their surf skis. For me, that's the problem, not the restlessness of the innovators.
Timothy

Roger Thomson - date: 2011/09/28 07:51 am


Couldn't agree more, everyone has acted in their own interests as economic agents and been let down. Marx was right that capitalism was inherently unstable, but wrong in that socialism has been proved not to be the answer. How do we constrain the instability without dampening the growth? Do we *need* increasingly complex financial instruments or have they gone beyond what capitalism really requires?

Timothy Pascoe - date: 2011/09/28 07:41 am


Dear Ed,
Great to hear from you and thanks for the suggestion for a longer response to the HBR article. Sadly (or happily) at the moment, I've too much else on the go.
Thanks, though, for the kind thought.
Timothy

W Edward Massey - date: 2011/09/28 07:39 am


Timothy,
Damn good one.
I think you should expand it and submit it right back to Harvard Business Review.
If they really want to make a difference to business leaders, they need to cull out the sanctimonious new think and go back to basics.
Leaders are there to provide leadership. They thrive on periods of discontinuity because that is what leaders do and how we know they are leaders.
Wow, I guess Nonaki and Takeuchi would have thrown up their hands and told Churchill to build a shared consensus.
What is your strategy, they demanded. To win.
Wise leaders are the ones who lead people to victory.
You really have a good one here, push it further.
Edward


W - date: 2011/09/28 07:36 am

Timothy Pascoe - date: 2011/09/27 04:30 pm


Peter,

A comment from you is worth a lot! Many thanks,

Timothy

Peter Morgan - date: 2011/09/27 04:29 pm


Timothy,

Your infrequent correspondent thoroughly agrees for what thats worth.

Best regards,

Peter


Would you like to reproduce this Potshot?

We encourage people to republish this Potshot online, or in print. However, please take the time to read our License Terms and so that you can properly attribute the republished Potshot